Ok, this has acctualy been bothering me. and it will continue to do so for a wile untill this is posted XD.

Hagendis Attack;

So many people use Hagendis Beating. But why? Sure it goes up to lvl 15, and thus its 5 points superior to Hagendis hit. And it looks cool with the "Blast Wings" or whatever name you want to give it, but lets look at the facts:(Pease note the DMG may vairy, This is taken on average from my character)

I have a lvl 40 fire warrior with Hagendis attack grade 5, Hagendis hit lvl 10 and Hagendis beating lvl 15.(duh)

This is what I came to realize.. Hagendis attack vs hit, Hit is far superior. Great! what about hit and beating?
With the following STR stat of 280 I get the following results against a Sheep lvl 45 Earth (Hp 348).Using Hagendis Beating using 67 sp with the usual 9 hits (including the finishing blow) I get 52x8 + 59. So with a simple application of maths that sums up to 475 total dmg. But with Hagendis Hit using 49 sp I get 64x8 + 128 which equals to 640 total damage.
This concludes that Hit is 165 dmg more affective than Beating and it costs 18 less mana!

The question is..Why use Hagendis Beating on 1 monster?

Last edited Sun, 28 Dec 2008, 12:59am by ChaosTitan